Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(957)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2014 Month : July Volume : 3 Issue : 31 Page : 8646-8652

AN ANALYSIS OF MATERNAL DEATHS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE

Aparna R. Wahane1, Prachi Sauarbh Koranne2

1. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra.
2. Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. Aparna R. Wahane,
Email : arwahane94@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Aparna R. Wahane,
GMC Quarters, Ground Floor,
Sindhi Camp, Near Nehru Park,
Akola-444001.
Email: arwahane94@gmail.com

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Maternal death has been recognized as an area of maternal care that requires urgent attention.Making efforts to decrease maternal mortality is a matter of great concern to the obstetricians. MMR is a very sensitive index that reflects quality of reproductive care provided to the pregnant woman.OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to help generate information and knowledge regarding the causes and complications leading to maternal deaths (MDs) in an urban tertiary care hospital, to find if any of them are potentially preventable, and to use information thus generated to save lives.METHODS: It was a retrospective study.The medical records of all maternal deaths occurring over a period of 4 years between January 2010and December 2013 were reviewed and correlated with maternal age, antenatal registration, mode of delivery, parity, admission death interval, and causes of death.RESULTS: The maternal mortality rate (MMR) ranged between 926 and 377/100,000 births in the study period. The causes of deaths were sepsis 23.84%, eclampsia/pregnancy-induced hypertension 17.69%, hemorrhage 13.84%, hepatitis13.84%, anemia 13.07%, respiratory infections 8.46%, other indirect obstetrical causes 6.15%, and unrelated causes 4.61%.Maximum deaths (71.53%) occurred in women between 21 and 30 years of age while multigravida had MMR of 51.53%. Mortality was highest in postnatal mothers 63.06%.Unbooked cases constituted 92.31% of MDs and included 25% referred cases. Conclusion: Overall maternal mortality was 690/100,000. MDs due to direct obstetric causes were 55.38%, indirect obstetric deaths 40%, and unrelated deaths 4.61%. The causes of potentially preventable deaths include deaths due to anemia, sepsis, hemorrhage, DIC, and anesthesia complication, and accounted for 25.38% of all deaths.

KEYWORDS: maternal mortality, direct obstetric death, indirect obstetric death, unrelated deaths.

INTRODUCTION: Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is number of maternal deaths (MDs) per 100,000 live births during a given period. Maternal mortality rate is number of MDs in a given period per 100,000 women of reproductive age during the same period1. Direct MD is the result of a complication of the pregnancy, delivery, or their management. Indirect MD is a pregnancy-related death in a patient with pre-existing or newly developed health problem. Other fatalities during but unrelated to pregnancy are non-obstetric/unrelated causes.

Late MD is defined as the death of a woman from direct or indirect cause >42 days but <1 year after termination of pregnancy. Fortuitous or incidental causes are deaths from unrelated causes which happen to occur in pregnancy or puerperium (suicide, accident, murder).1 Each minute of every day, at least one womanin developing countries dies, as a result of complications arising during pregnancy and childbirth.2 Global maternal mortality is at 529,000 women per year, of which only 1% deaths occur in developed world while99% occur in developing countries.3 In developedcountries MMR averages at 27/100, 000 births.

Developing countries have MMR of 480/100,000 while underdeveloped countries have an MMR of 890/100, 000births. Worldwide MMR is 200-600/100,000 births.1An estimated 30 million women experience pregnancy every year and 27 million have live births. In India, 125,000 women die per year due to pregnancy-related complications (one death every 5 minutes). National average of MMR is 540/100,000 births (NFHS 98-99), while in rural India the ratio is 619/100,000 births.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Government medical college Akola is one of the biggest urban general hospitals in Vidarbha region of Maharashtra. It gets referrals from maternity homes, poly-clinics, rural and urban slums, district and primary health centers, other level II hospitals of Akola district and from neighboring districts. The present study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of this hospital. It was a retrospective analytical study.

The medical records of all maternal deaths occurring in the peripartum period between January 2010 and December 2013 were reviewed irrespective to place of delivery and correlated with various factors like age, parity, hospital antenatal supervision, delivery status, admission death interval, and causes of deaths. All women requiring hospital care were admitted irrespective of the availability of beds, vacancy of ICU bed, or antenatal registration in the hospital. Autopsy could not be conducted on any of the bodies due to lack of consent.

RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS: Between January 2010 and December 2013, there were a total of 18, 814 deliveries and 130 maternal deaths.

Year

Deliveries

Maternal deaths

Maternal mortality ratio/1, 00, 000 births

2010

4747

44

926

2011

4817

33

685

2012

3928

33

840

2013

5322

20

377

total

18814

130

690

Table 1: Year-wise distribution of deliveries, MDs, and yearly MMR

 

The mean maternal mortality rate was 690/100,000 births. Un-booked cases were 92.31%(120/130), booked cases (more than three visits) were only 1.54% (2/130), and registered (less than three visits)cases were 6.15% (8/130). Un-booked cases included 24.16% (29/120) referred cases, all of whom had delivered outside [23 vaginal deliveries, 06 lower segment caesarean section (LSCS)], and were subsequently admitted to our hospital. Among institutional deliveries (101/130), 30.69% delivered vaginally, 21.78% had LSCS, and 47.52% died in antenatal period.

 

years

No of women

<20 years

No of women

21-30 years

No of women

>31 years

No of maternal

 deaths

2010

10

32

2

44

2011

3

26

4

33

2012

3

24

6

33

2013

6

11

3

20

total

22

93

15

130

 

16.92%

71.53%

11.54%

260

Table 2: Maternal deaths according to age

As shown following table 3, 95.65% women came from rural areas & only 4.34% came from urban areas. 83.47% belonged to poor socioeconomic status & 13.04% had average, 3.47% good socioeconomic status.

Literacy was 27.82% upto middle school, & 0 literacy in 43.47%.

 

 

No. of maternal deathsPercent

Area

Rural

95.65%

Urban

4.34%

Socio Economic

Status

Poor

83.47%

Average

13.04%

Good

3.47%

Literacy

High School

5.21%

Middle School

27.82%

Primary

23.47%

Nil

43.47%

 

In our study the postnatal death rate was 63.08% (82/130) and antenatal death rate was 36.92% (48/130). Postnatal Maternal deaths s(n=82) include 41.54% (n=54) deaths after vaginal delivery and 21.54% (n=28) after LSCS. Antenatal deaths include 7.69% (10/48) early pregnancy deaths(septic abortion, ectopic deaths).

Variable

No. of maternal deaths

Percentage(%)

Antenatal(undelivered)

38

29.23

Postnatal-vaginal

54

41.53

Post natal-LSCS

28

21.53

Early pregnancy deaths

10

7.69

Total deaths

130

 

Table 4: Delivery method and maternal deaths

 

Highest mortality of71.53% was noted in the age group of 21-30 years, while mortality of 16.92 and 11.54% was noted in women aged<20 and >30 years, respectively (Tables 2 and 3).Multi gravida women (up to gravida three) had maximum MMR of 51.54% (67/130), while primi and grand multi-gravida comprised 23.08 and 16.15%, respectively.

 Parity was not documented in 9.23% (12/130) women. Forty-five percent of women died within 24 hours of admission, direct obstetric deaths occurred in 55.39% (72/130), indirect obstetric deaths in 40% (52/130), and deaths due to unrelated causes in 4.61% (6/130).

Direct obstetrical deaths include death from sepsis43.05% (31/72), hemorrhage 22.22% (16/72), eclampsia and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) 31.94% (23/72), and thrombo embolism 2.8% (2/72). Year-wise distribution of direct obstetric deaths is illustrated in Table 5.

 

Year

Sepsis

Hemorrhage

Eclampsia

Embolism

total

2010

No(%)

No(%)

No(%)

No(%)

44

2011

9(20.45)

9(20.45)

4(9.09)

1(2.27)

33

2012

8(24.24)

5(15.15)

6(18.18)

0

33

2013

7(21.21)

6(18.18)

5(15.15)

1(3.03)

20

 

7(35)

1(5)

3(15)

0

 

Table 5: Year wise distribution of direct obstetric deaths

 

Sepsis cases included post abortion 19.36% (6/31), surgical wound sepsis 29.03% (9/31), puerperal sepsis 29.03% (9/31), and probable septicemia 22.58%(7/31).

The latter constituted of cases that were treated as septicemia on clinical grounds though they were culture negative (already on antibiotic). Hemorrhage accounted for 12.31% (16/72) of direct obstetric deaths and included 75% (12/16) of deaths by primary postpartumhemorrhage (PPH) and 25% (4/16) by rupture uterus.

Eclampsia and PIH accounted for 17.69% (23/72) of all maternal deaths. Indirect obstetric deaths occurred in40% (52/130) women, and included deaths due to hepatitis 34.61% (18/52), anemia 32.70% (17/52), respiratory diseases 21.15% (11/52), heart diseases3.84% (2/52), CNS disease 2.0% (1/52), surgical disease3.84% (2/52), and enteric fever 2.0% (1/52). Unrelated causes constituted 4.61% (6/130) of MDs and included anesthesia complication 0.76% (n=1), acute blood reaction 0.76% (n=1), surgical cause (gut perforation) 1.53% (n=2), aspiration syndrome 0.76 %( n=1), and COPD cor pulmonale 0.76% (n=1)

Our study when compared with other Indian studies done in the last 15 years on the causes of maternal deaths reveals a varying range of causes (Table 6).

 

Name & year

PIH

(%)

HM

(%)

Sepsis(%)

Anemia

(%)

Hepatitis

(%)

Early preg.deaths

(%)

Other indirect causes

(%)

Direct obstetric causes

(%)

Indirect obstetric causes

(%)

Unrelated causes

Per 1000

Sharma S

(1994)

17.2

27.5

20.6

10.3

3.4

 

 

72.2

27.4

0.4

16.5

Bichi L

(1994)

39.6

11.1

29.6

 

14.8

 

 

80.46

17.2

2.4

13.68

Kulkarni S

(1996)

24.2

23.7

20.7

17.98

11.98

 

 

68.7

30

1.3

17.21

Khosla AH

(1999)

35

19.35

32.26

6.45

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.05

SulhanS

(2000)

16.3

18.18

14.54

27.27

 

 

 

60

40

 

3.92

Prasantha R(2005)

50.56

9.72

18.17

4.8

1.84

 

 

 

 

 

6.25

Present study

(2010-2013)

18

12

24

13

14

5%

14%

55.38

40

4.61

6.9

Table 6: Comparative analysis

 

DISCUSSION: MD or maternal mortality is the death of a woman in relation to pregnancy. According to World Health Organization (WHO), “A maternal death is defined as the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its management” (ICD-10)4.During the study period of 4 years the MMR ranged between 926/100,000 in 2010 and 377/1,000,000 births in 2013 (Table 1).

National average of MMR is540/100, 000 births (NFHS 98-99)3. Other Indian studies done in the last 15 years have shown wide variations in MMR ranging from 172/100,000 (1996) to 625/100, 000births (2005). Prasanta et al.5have observed the MMR of 625/100000 births. Other studies conducted before1999 have higher MMR ranging between 1307,1609, and170/100,000 births.6 Only Salhan et al. (2000) reported.7

MMR of 392/100,000 births. This variation could be explained due to many variables. This study has high MMR which can be due to the fact that it is one of the tertiary care referral hospital that gets referrals from neighboring districts as well.

Our study showed that 71.53% of women die between the ages 21 and 30 years, as highest number of women belong to this age group. Similarly multigravidas constitute 51.53% of MDs. Admission death interval analysis of our study revealed that 45% of women died within 24 hours of admission, possibly due to poor general condition of women on admission, late referrals, and at times due to a long travel time from neighboring districts.

Twenty-four percent of these women died within6 hours of admission as they were in moribund or comatose condition. More than half (63.06%) of the MDs occurred in postpartum period and included 41.54% deaths after vaginal delivery and 21.54% after LSCS. Antenatal women constituted 36.92% of all MDs and included 7.69% of early pregnancy deaths also (septic abortion and ectopic deaths).

This study highlighted that 92.30% of women were un-booked while only 1.53% were booked cases. Registered cases comprised only 6.15% of all deaths. The analysis revealed that 55.39% of deaths are due to direct obstetrics causes, 40% due to indirect obstetrics causes, 4.61% due to unrelated causes. Other studies have shown variation in direct obstetrics deaths from 60 to 80%. Our figure of 55.39% is closer with Salhan et al (2000)7at 60% and Kulkarni et al.6 at 68.7%. Percentage variation of indirect obstetrics deaths ranges between 17.2%,8 and 40%7and our study.

Direct obstetric deaths accounted for 55.39% of all deaths in our study and included: sepsis 23.84%, hemorrhage 12.30%, eclampsia and PIH 17.69%, and embolism 1.53%. Sepsis which is a direct consequence of poor hygiene during delivery accounts for 15% of MDs globally.2

In comparative analysis it varies between 14.54 and 32.26%. In our study it was 24% which falls between the range but is higher than global figure. Year-wise analysis of our study showed a gradual increase in sepsis deaths from 20.45% in 2010 to 35% in 2013 (Table 5).

This increase is probably due to emergence of multidrug resistant strain of bacteria in the urban community, maybe due to irrational use of higher generation antibiotics at peripheral level. Another cause is overcrowding in the wards, there is 150-180% bed occupancy rate in gynecology wards almost throughout the year.9

Sepsis remains the leading cause of MDs in our study. Hemorrhage especially during postpartum is sudden, unpredictable, and is more dangerous when woman has preexisting anemia.

Globally 25% of all MDs are due to hemorrhage.2 Other studies show variation between 9.72and 27.5%. In our study the rate of hemorrhage deaths was 12.31%. Year-wise analysis revealed a significant decrease in deaths due to hemorrhage from 20.45% in2010 to 5% in 2013 It could be due to liberal use of blood and component transfusions, vigorous fluid replacement, and follow-up with advanced investigative facilities. Eclampsia and PIH account for 13% of MDs globally2.Other studies reveal a large variation in eclampsia deaths between 50.56%5and 16.3%.10

Our study had eclampsia deaths of 18%. Year-wise analysis revealed that percentage deaths in 2010 was 9.09% (presumably under documented), while in later years it showed insignificant decline from 18.18% in 2011 to 15% in2013. Active use of MgSO4 regimen, better monitoring and investigative facilities, and vigorous management techniques have failed to bring a significant decrease in eclampsia deaths. Thromboembolism deaths during thestudy period ranged from 3% in 2010-2012 no deaths in 2011-2013.

Globally indirect obstetrics causes account for 20% of all MDs particularly from anemia, malaria, HIV, CVS disease, etc. Other studies show this range between17.2%7and 40%.10 In our study it was 40% and included deaths due to hepatitis 13.84%, anemia 13.0%, respiratory diseases 8.46%, heart diseases 1.54%, surgical cause1.54%, CNS disease 0.77%, and enteric fever 0.77%.Other studies show anemia deaths range from 4.8 to27.27%, while in our study it was 13% (Table 5).

The percentage of deaths due to anemia is a grossly underestimated figure because pre-existing anemia is a major contributory factor of direct obstetrical deaths due to PPH and sepsis. A significant finding of our study was the high mortality noted in cases of pregnancy complicated by hepatitis (13.84%). It is even marginallyhigher than anemia deaths (13%).

 Viral hepatitis is endemic in Akola. In these cases the cause of death was hepatic failure and encephalopathy and/or coagulation failure. The correspondingrates from other studies are 1.84-14.8%. Unrelated causes constitute 4.61% of allMDs.

Deaths due to anemia and sepsis along with hemorrhage, DIC, anesthesia difficulties/complications, and non-availability of ICU bed are considered potentially preventable causes and accounted for 25.38% (33/130) of all deaths.

CONCLUSION: The classical triad of causes of maternal mortality in our study remained sepsis, eclampsia, and hemorrhage, in the same order. According to the WHO report (2005)“make every mother and child count” hemorrhage is the leading cause of death. Sepsis and hemorrhage deaths are considered one of the potentially preventable causes of MDs.

 The present study highlights the importance of early antenatal registration of all pregnancies and regular follow-up of cases by trained staff. Poor nutritional status, lack of antenatal care, unawareness of warning signs of pregnancy, unsupervised/dai-handled deliveries, social bias toward blood donation, and late referrals are the major contributory factors leading to poor maternal prognosis.

The lessons learnt through review of records of MDs have helped us to identify the high-risk group, solely for the purpose of improving service-delivery system by ascertaining the cause of death, reason(s) for inability to provide appropriate care at appropriate time, and finding the key interventions at service-delivery level to prevent similar deaths.

 There should be active management of high-risk group by frequent ANC visits, direct consultant supervision, liberal use of CTG, color Doppler study, biochemical markers, fluid and component transfusions, aggressive management of infection, and closer monitoring of women in labor. Vigorous mass campaign for community-based maternal education program should be the top priority of all maternal and child health programs.

REFERENCES:

1.    Maternal death. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/maternal_death.
2.    Maternal mortality. http://www.icm.tn.gov.in/intersession/Matnal.htm.
3.    Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet 2006; 368 (9542): 1189-200.
4.    Matthews Mathai. Reviewing maternal deaths andcomplications to make pregnancy and childbirth safer.Regional Health Forum WHO South-East Asia Region2005; 9 (1).
5.    Pal Amitava, Prasanta R, Samir H, Mondal TK. Review ofchanging trends in maternal mortality in a rural medicalcollege in West Bengal. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2005; 55(6): 521-4.
6.    Kulkarni S, Athani S, Seetaram S. Maternal mortality of Head Quarter hospital, Bellary. J Obstet Gynaecol Ind.1996; 46 (4): 492-6.
7.    Salhan S, Sharma M, Suri J. Maternal mortality in a tertiary hospital. JOSH 2000; 7: 78-79.
8.    Khosla AH, Dahiya K, Sangwan K. Maternal mortality and ‘near miss’ in rural north India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.2000 Feb; 68 (2): 163-4.
9.    Bichli L, Razvi NA. Maternal mortality (an analytical study). J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 1995; 45: 901-905.
10.    Sharma S. A study of maternal mortality in a ruralmedical college hospital. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 1994; 44:548-51.

Videos :

watch?v