Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(1404)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2014 Month : August Volume : 3 Issue : 39 Page : 10026-10046

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF SURGICAL CORRECTION OF CTEV BY CINCINNATI APPROACH

K. G. Gopalakrishna1, K. S. Manjunath2, Chandrashekar3

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute.
2. Professor and HOD, Department of Orthopaedics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute.
3. Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. K. G. Gopalakrishna
Email : gopalkgortho@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. K. G. Gopalakrishna,
#106, Ideal Apts, 16th Cross,
Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Bangalore – 98.
Email: gopalkgortho@gmail.com

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Surgical correction of congenital talipes equino varus (ctev) is to address adequately all aspects of this complex foot deformity. Various exposures have been elucidated with varying results and complications. This prospective study discusses the cincinnati approach advocated by Mackay to address the various aspects of clubfoot correction. Objective: To study the adequacy of exposure, wound healing and problems related to Cincinnati approach. To study the effectiveness of primary surgical correction. METHODS: The present prospective study includes treatment of 24 feet in 21 patients with clubfoot treated with posteromedial and lateral soft tissue release by Cincinnati approach and followed up with an average follow up of 6.9 months. 3 (12.5%) were followed up for 1 year and 3 (12.5%) lost for the follow up. 18 (75%) were followed up to 6 months. All were resistant to correction by conservative method. Age at operation averaged 1.6 year, ranged from 9 months to 3 years. RESULTS: Results were evaluated using Laaveg and Ponseti functional rating system of clubfoot. Postoperatively the average arc of movement in ankle joint was 370, which was 50% of normal limb. Inversion, eversion movement of subtalar joint was 230, bimalleolar angle was 770.The functional results were excellent in 6 feet (25%), good in 12 feet (50%), fair in 5 feet (20.83%) and poor in 1 foot (4.17%). In our series complications encountered were post-operative focal necrosis in 3 feet (12.5%) and marginal necrosis in 3 feet (12.5%). CONCLUSION: Cincinnati incision provides an adequate exposure for extensive surgical release under direct vision, there by bony realignment of talus over calcaneus was restored and hence the restoration of normal bimalleolar angle. Skin closure is not found to be a problem in achieving a primary closure. Wound healing leaves only a thin and cosmetically acceptable scar.
KEYWORDS: CTEV, cincinnati incission, subtalar release, bimalleolar angle.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic clubfoot is one of the oldest and commonest congenital deformities of mankind. Hippocrate (460 BC -377BC)1 was the first person to describe club foot. The initial treatment of clubfoot is non-operative. It was concluded that most of the club foot can be successfully managed by a series of Plaster casts and wedging without the use anesthetics, or operative procedures with better results.2,3
In neglected, resistant, recurrent, relapsed, failed conservatively treated CTEV pathological contractures of the soft tissues prevented the reduction of the navicular on the head of talus and calcaneum and surgical correction becomes necessary.4
The comprehensive soft tissue release in current favor is posteromedial release of Turco. Mukhopadhyay procedure with its variants and circumferential release as described by McKay, Carrol and Simons, etc. are some of more than hundred surgeries described.
The conventional Turcos approach, although widely practiced, is associated with non-acceptable scar something keloid, difficult visualization of the other side of ankle and subtalar joint, incomplete soft tissue release, incomplete peritalar release, incomplete subtalar release and incomplete correction of rotation deformity of calcaneum. This could lead on to either persistence or recurrence of deformity.
To predicate the above mentioned problem circumferential Cincinnati approach has been practiced worldwide. A significantly lower incidence of wound complications was seen in the Cincinnati treatment group when compared with the modified Turco.5 so we intend to study the surgical management of CTEV by Cincinnati approach in light of the published literature.

OBJECTIVES OF STUDY:

RELATED TO APPROACH: To study the adequacy of exposure, wound healing and problems related to Cincinnati approach.

RELATED TO PROCEDURE: To study the effectiveness of primary surgical correction.
Surgery in the treatment of clubfoot must be tailored to the age of the child and to the deformity to be corrected.
A modified McKay procedure through a transverse circumferential (Cincinnati) incision is our preferred technique
Any approach should be able to address the release in all quadrants, which are as follows:
Plantar: Plantar fascia, abductor hallucis, flexor digitorum brevis, long and short plantar ligaments
Medial: Medial structures, tendon sheaths, talonavicular and subtalar release, tibialis posterior, FHL, and FDL lengthening
Posterior: Ankle and subtalar capsulotomy, especially releasing post talofibular and tibiofibular ligaments and the calcaneofibular ligaments
Lateral: Lateral structures, peroneal sheath, calcaneocuboid joint, and completion of talonavicular and subtalar release
Any approach should afford adequate exposure. Structures to be released or lengthened are the following:
Achilles tendon.
Tendon sheaths of the muscles crossing the subtalar joint.
Posterior ankle capsule and deltoid ligament.
Inferior tibiofibular ligament.
Fibulocalcaneal ligament.
Capsules of the talonavicular and subtalar joints.
Division of associated ligaments around the subtalar joint.
Plantar fascia and intrinsic muscles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present prospective clinical study includes treatment of 24 feet in 21 patients with clubfoot treated with posteromedial and lateral soft tissue release by Cincinnati approach from the period November 2007 to October 2009. Conducted in department of Orthopaedics, Bangalore Medical College and research institute, Victoria, Bowring & Lady Curzon Hospitals, Bangalore between November 2007 to October 2009 A prior consent was obtained from all the patients and the study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Hospital.
METHODOLOGY: Required data was collected from patients admitted in Victoria Hospital, Bowring and Lady Curzon hospitals. All patients included in study were assessed pre-operatively and post operatively (clinical and functional) as per Laaveg and Ponseti functional rating system score.
    Children with idiopathic CTEV, more than 6 months of age (Neglected CTEV)-<3years, Rigid CTEV, partially corrected CTEV (failed conservative)/recurrent CTEV were included for the study. X-rays of foot, routine Blood investigations, weight recording done. Cases were followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6months and 1year.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA: less than 6 months
•    Flexible CTEV.
•    Aquired talipes equino varus (trauma, burns, neurogenic, muscular dystrophies-, AMC, Teratological-etc).
•    >3 years where bony procedures were needed.

OBSERVATION AND RESULTS: The present study includes treatment of 24 feet in 21 patients with clubfoot treated with posteromedial and lateral soft tissue release by Cincinnati approach from the period November 2007 to October 2009 and followed up with an average follow up of 6.9 months. 3 (12.5%) were followed up for 1 year and 3 (12.5%) lost for the follow up. 18 (75%) were followed up to 6 months. Age at operation averaged 1.6 year ranged from 9 months to 3 years.

 

Age distribution:

Age in years

Total

unilateral

Bilateral

9 months _1 year

7

5

2

1.1 _2 year

9

8

1

2.1_3 year

5

5

0

Total

21

18

3

Table 1: Showing age distribution

 

Sex distribution:

Sex

No. of cases

Percentage

Male

15

71.4%

Female

6

28.6%

Total

21

100

Table 2: showing sex distribution

 

Side affected

No. of cases

Percentage

Unilateral

18

86%

Bilateral

3

14%

Total

21

100

Table 3: Table showing side affected

 

 

 

Foot size

No. of feet

Percentage

8.1_9 cm

6

25%

9.1_10 cm

10

45.84%

10.1_11 cm

2

8.33%

>11 cm

5

20.83%

Total

24

100

Table 4: Table showing foot size

 

Components of

deformity

Grading of deformity

Severe (passively could not be corrected to neutral)

Moderate (passively overcorrected up to neutral

Mild (passively overcorrected beyond neutral

Nil (complete absence of deformity)

Total

Equinus

14

10

0

0

24

varus

11

13

0

0

24

Forefoot adduction

2

17

5

0

24

cavus

0

5

8

11

24

Table 5: Table showing severity of deformity

 

 

Type of incision

No of feet

Percentage

Complete Cincinnati

21

87.5 %

Hemi cincinnati

3

12.5 %

total

24

100

Table 6: Table showing type of incision used

 

 

Soft tissue release

No. of feet

percentage

Posteromedial release only

3

12.5%

Posteromedial and lateral release

21

87.5 %

Table 7: Table showing soft tissue release

 

 

Subtalar Release

No of feet

Percentage

Medial and posterior release

13

54.17 %

Medial, posterior and lateral release

11

45.83 %

Total

24

100

Table 8: Table showing subtalar release

 

Skin complications

No. of feet

Percentage

No necrosis

17

70.54 %

Focal necrosis

3

12.5 %

Marginal necrosis

3

12.5 %

Severe necrosis

1

4.46 %

Total

24

100

Table 9: Table showing wound complications

 

 

ROM in deg

Ankle DF

%

Ankle PF

%

Inversion

%

Eversion

%

0_5

1

4.17%

0

0

0

0

11

45.83%

5_10

12

50%

0

0

4

16.67%

13

54.17%

10_15

11

45.8%

1

4.17%

10

41.7%

0

0

15_20

0

0

7

29.16%

10

41.7%

0

0

20_25

0

0

9

37.5%

0

0

0

0

25_30

0

0

7

29.16%

0

0

0

0

Table 10: Table showing post-operative ROM

 

 

Deformity correction

No of feet

Percentage

Completely corrected

20

83.33%

Partially corrected

4

16.67%

Total

24

100

Table 11: Table showing results of deformity correction

 

 

Pt satisfaction

No. of feet

Percentage

Very satisfaction

17

70.83%

Satisfaction

7

29.17%

Un satisfaction

0

0

Total

24

100

Table 12: Table showing functional satisfaction with end result

 

 

Functional

No of feet

Percentage

No limitation of activities

11

45.83%

Occasional limitation

13

54.17%

Limitation on strenuous activities

0

0

Limitation in routine activities

0

0

Total

24

100 %

Table 13: Table showing rating system for adequacy of daily living

 

 

Pain

No. of feet

Percentage

Never painful

11

45.83%

Occasionally painful during strenuous activities.

13

54.17%

Usually painful in strenuous activities.

0

0

Occasionally painful during routine activities.

0

0

Total

24

100%

Table 14: Table showing rating system for pain

 

 

Position of heel

No. of feet

Percentage

0 0varus

18

75%

1_50

6

25%

6_100

0

0

>100

0

0

Total

24

100

Table 15: Table showing position of heel while standing

 

 

Results

No. of feet

Percentage

Excellent

6

25

Good

12

50

Fair

5

20.83

Poor

1

4.17

Total

24

100

 

CASE 1: BILATERAL NEGLECTED CTEV

Pre op photographs

 



Videos :

watch?v