Citations(0)

Content

How to Cite This Article

Download Download [ PDF ]

Email Send to a friend

Page Views Page Views(1920)

Facebook ShareFacebook Share

Twitter ShareTwitter Share

Year : 2015 Month : March Volume : 4 Issue : 27 Page : 4599-4604

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DENGUE FEVER IN SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

B. Arunasree1, Prasad Uma2, B. Rajsekhar3

1. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, RIMS, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh.
2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, RIMS, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh.
3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, MIMS, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Dr. Prasad Uma,
Email : usha1966411@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dr. Prasad Uma,
Q. No. 49-3-3,
Lalithanagar,
Visakhapatnam-530016,
Andhra Pradesh.
E-mail: usha1966411@gmail.com

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Dengue fever is one of the most important Arboviral diseases in man with outbreaks in India and South East Asia.Published data regarding the prevalence of dengue fever in coastal Andhra Pradesh is not available. We report a prospective analysis of dengue positive cases referred from various primary health centres of rural, tribal and semiurban areas of Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh. AIMS OF STUDY: To analyse the burden of Dengue fever in the Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was under taken between January-2013 to December-2014 by testing clinically suspected primary Dengue patients attending tertiary care centre in the Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. Blood samples were collected from patients with dengue fever like febrile illness attending the Pediatric and Medicine clinics.The sera collected from suspected patients were analysed for Dengue specific IgM antibody by IgM antibody capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using NIV kit. The data was analysed. RESULTS: During the study period the total number of samples screened with clinical suspicion of dengue fever was 695, out of which 97(13.95%) were positive for IgM antibodies. The IgM positivity was 54 (55.67%) in males and 43 (44.3%) in females. Of the 97 reactive cases, 41 (42.26%) were positive paediatric cases (<14 yrs) and 56(57.73%) were adults. The number of seropositive cases referred from rural and tribal areas was 54(55.67%).The percentage of IgM positive dengue fever was found to be high during the months of September. CONCLUSION: The number of seropositive dengue fever was more in the months of monsoon indicating that vulnerability to dengue infection is more during this period.Efforts have to be made through community awareness and early institution of therapy. Vector control measures should be in full swing at the very onset of monsoon.

KEYWORDS: Dengue fever, IgM positivity, Srikakulam district.

INTRODUCTION: Dengue fever (DF) is a vector borne disease caused by four closely related Dengue viruses (DENV-1-4) Dengue fever is commonly distributed in most tropical and sub- tropical areas where Aedesaegypti and /or A. albopictus are abundant. Dengue leads to considerable disease burden morbidity, mortality especially in the tropics, with more than 2/5th of the world’s population living in areas at risk for Dengue. From being a sporadic illness, epidemics of dengue have now become a regular occurrence worldwide.[1,2]

Denguefever has been recognized for manyyearsin India sincetheoutbreakof Denguein 1912 in Kolkata.[3] In south India all the four serotypes of Dengueviruswere firstisolatedfrom febrilepatients in Vellore, Tamil Nadu between 1956 and 1966. However until 1990 no major outbreak of Dengue fever/Dengue hemorrhagic fever was reported in Tamil Nadu.[4] One of the largest out breaks in North India occurred in Delhi and adjoining areas in 1996, which was mainly due to Dengue-2 virus.Thereafter in 2003, another outbreak occurred in Delhi and all four Dengue virus serotypes were found to be co-circulating.[5]

In the recent years DF/DHF out breaks were reported in Chennai, Krishnagiri and Dharmapuri district, in 2001. From 2004 to 2005 there has been an increase in the number of Dengue reporting units. Present study was carried out to determine the epidemiological determinants of dengue cases referred to tertiary care centre from various primary health centres both rural and tribal area in Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh, which would help in rendering adequate preventive measures to control the disease.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective descriptive study was under taken between January-2013 to December-2014 by testingclinically suspected primary Dengue patients attending tertiary care centre in the Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh. This centre receives samples from semiurban, rural and tribal areas from Srikakulam district.

Blood samples were collected from patients with Dengue fever (DF) like febrile illness attending the Pediatric and Medicine clinics. The patents were diagnosedas havingDF based on standard criteria; presentationwith febrile illness of 2 to 7 days duration with features like headache, myalgia arthralgia, rash, hemorrhagic manifestations, thrombocytopenia and leucopenia.The exact date of sampling was not available for most of the patents.Approximately 3 ml of blood was collected, serum was separated.The sera collected from suspected patients were analysed for Dengue specific IgM antibody by IgM antibody capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using NIV kit. The data was analysed.

RESULTS: During the study period, the total number of samples screened was 695 of which 97 (13.95%) were positive for IgM antibodies (Table 1 & 2). There was decrease in the percentage positivity in 2014 when compared to 2013 (P<0.05).

Of the 695 cases screened, 294 (42.30%) were paediatric cases and 401 (57.69%) were adults. Of the 97 reactive cases, 41(42.26%) were positive paediatric cases (<14 yrs) and 56 (57.73%) were adults. The IgM positivity was 54 (55.67%) in males and 43 (44.3%) in females.The samples were collected among the age group of 0-70 years and the distribution of seropositive cases in adults was uniform in the age group ranging from 19 years to 62 years.Among the paediatric age group, positivity was higher in 1-5 and 6-12 yrs age group. (Table 3 & 4).

The observed dengue IgM seropositivity month wise is illustrated for the year 2013 and 2014.The percentage of IgM positivity was found to be high during the months of September in all the two years. (Table 1&2).The observed dengue IgM seropositivity percentage showed an increase with increase in the monthly rainfall. There was an increased seropositivity during the cooler months. The number of seropositive cases referred from rural and tribal areas was more 54(55.67%).

 

DISCUSSION: Dengue occurs globally in tropical and subtropical regions where mosquito species which are vectors of the disease are found.At least 2.5 billion people, two fifths of World’ population is at risk of dengue virus infection and the number of infections worldwide may reach 50 million cases annually. Present study was carried out to determine the epidemiological determinants of dengue cases referred to the tertiary care centre from various primary health centres both rural and tribal area in the Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh.

                Hitesh Bhabhor et al[6] from Ahmadabad analyzed 797 patients with clinical suspicion of dengue fever. His observations were, the prevalence of dengue fever cases was more during the month of October (27.60%), agegroup which was most affected was between 15-24 years (41.65%), males were more affected than females(64.24%) and 95.48% got cured without any complications. Ashwini Kumar et al[7] from Udipi district, Karnataka recorded 19.1% of cases in the month ofSeptember with 57.3% of cases occurring during 15-44 years of age. Jamaiah et al[8] from Kualalumpur Malaysia recorded 22% of cases in the month of January.

P. Gunasekha et al[9] from Chennai analyzed 968 cases with 84% of pediatric cases being< 14 years and 15.5% being adults. IgM positivity was seen in 43.1% of cases with 36.7% being in males and 52.8% being females. The prevalence of dengue fever was more common in females. Noticeable increased in occurrence of cases was seen during cooler month’s i.e during monsoon and post monsoon months. In a study conducted in Delhi,[10] 21-30 years age group was most commonly affected and another study conducted in Kanpur,[11] showed 0-15 year’s age group to be commonly affected.

                Sanghamitra Padhi et al[12] of Southern Odhisha tested 5102 samples, 1074(21.05%) were positive for dengue IgM antibodies. Majority 47.86% of cases were detected in the month of September indicating an active viral transmission during monsoon and post monsoon period. The most common affected age group was between 11-20 years followed by 21-30 years.Seasonal trend in each year showed that there were almost no positive cases from January to June, the infection started spreading in August, reaching its peak in September and October and slowly declined in December. IgM seropositivity was more among females (21.2%), while 20.9% in males.

                In the present study the prevalence of seropositive dengue fever cases showed gradual rise from the month of March (7.2%), May (10.30%), June (16.49%), August (17.52%) to September (30.72%) followed by decrease in prevalence of cases from October (5.15%). No cases were recorded in the month of February, establishing the fact that active viral transmission occurs during monsoon and post monsoon months as observed in other studies.However in the present study significant proportion of cases occurred in other months reflecting the fact thatanti mosquito measures were not properly implemented. Out of 695 cases with clinical symptoms of dengue fever, dengue IgM positivity was seen in 13.95% of cases which is significant (P value <.05) indicates active dengue virus activity. Males were more affected (55.67%). Age group most commonly affected was 19-48 years (39.1%) and children between 1-12 years (31.95%).

 

CONCLUSION: Transmission of dengue fever increases in monsoon.This shows that the presence of stagnating water after rainfall favours breeding of the mosquito vector resulting in an increasing incidence of dengue fever.These findings also indicates that vulnerability to dengue infection is more during this period.Efforts have to be made through community awareness and early institution of therapy. Vector control measures should be in full swing at the very onset of monsoon.

 

REFERENCES:

1.    Gubler DJ. The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral diseases as public health problems. Arch Med Res 2002; 33:330-42.
2.    McBride WJ, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H. Dengue viral infections, pathogenesis and epidemiology. Microbes Infect 2000; 2:1041-50.
3.    Kennedy RS. Some notes on an epidemic of Dengue-form fever amongst Indian troops, Calcutta. Indian Med Gaz 1912; 17:42.
4.    Victor TJ, Malathi M, Asokan R, Padmanaban P. Laboratory-based dengue fever surveillance in Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Med Res 2007;126:112-5.
5.    Kurukumbi M, Wali JP, Broor S, Aggarwal P, Seth P, Handa R, et al. Seroepidemiology and active surveillance of dengue fever/dengue hemorrhagic fever in Delhi. Indian J Med Sci 2001; 55:149-56.
6.    Hitesh Bhabhor, Nirmal Brahmbhatt, Ullas Machhar, Anoop Singh. Profile of dengue cases admitted to a Medical College hospital in Western India.2014; 4 (3): 235.
7.    Ashwini Kumar, C. R. Rao, Vinay Pandit, Seema Shetty, C. Bammigatti, C. M. Samara Singhee et al. Clinical manifestation and trend of dengue cases admitted in tertiary care hospital. Udupi district, Karnataka. Indian J Community Med.2010; 35: 386-90.
8.    Jamaiah, M Rohela, V. Nissapatorn, FT Hiew, A Mohammad Halizam, H Noorliani, AR Siti Khairunnisaak et al. Retrospective study of dengue fever and dengue hemorrhagic fever patients at University Malaya Medical centre, Kualalumpur, Malaysia in the year 2005.Southern Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2007;38:224-30.
9.    Gunasekaran P, Kaverik, Mohana S, Arunagiri K, Babu BVS, Priya PP et al. Dengue disease status in Chennai (2006-2008).A retrospective analysis. Indian J Med Res 2011; 133: 322-5.
10.    Gupta E, Das L, Narang P, Srivastava VK, Broor S. Serodiagnosis of dengue during an outbreak in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. Indian J Med Res.2005; 121: 36-8.
11.    Garg A, Garg V. Rao YK. Upadhyay GC, Sakhuja S. Prevalence of dengue among clinically suspected febrile episodes at a teaching hospital in North India.J.Infest.Dis.Immun.2011; 3: 85-9.
12.    Sanghamitra Panda, Muktikash Dasu, Pritilata Panda, Banojini Panda, Indrani Mohanty, Susmita Sahu and M. V. Narasimham. A three year retrospective study on increasing trend in seroprevalence of dengue infection from Southern Odisha, India. Indian J Med Res.2014; 140: 660-664.

Months

Clinically suspectedcases of Dengue fever

IgM

positive Cases

IgM Negative Cases

January

10

0

10

February

No. Cases

No. Cases

No. Cases

March

57

6

51

April

8

0

8

May

22

9

13

June

65

15

50

July

30

6

24

August

110

13

97

September

114

24

90

October

44

5

39

November

42

3

39

December

24

1

23

Total

526

82

444

Table 1: Distribution of cases month wise in the year-2013

 

 

Months

Clinically suspectedcases of Dengue fever

IgM positive Cases

IgM Negative Cases

January

3

0

3

February

3

0

3

March

4

1

3

April

2

1

1

May

6

1

5

June

26

1

25

July

14

1

13

August

38

4

34

September

57

6

51

October

No. Cases

No. Cases

No. Cases

November

No. Cases

No. Cases

No. Cases

December

16

0

16

Total

169

15

154

Table 2: Distribution of cases month wise in the year-2014

 

Gender

No.of Cases

<1 Year

1-5 Years

16-12 Years

13-18 Years

Male

24

1

8

9

6

Female

17

1

5

9

2

Total

41

2

13

18

8

Table 3: Age wise and sex wise distribution of IgM positive cases in children

 

 

Gender

No.of Cases

19-28 Years

29-38 Years

39-48 Years

49-58 Years

>58 Years

Male

30

7

8

2

3

10

Female

26

5

7

9

5

0

Total

56

12

15

11

8

10

Table 4: Age wise and sex wise distribution of IgM positive cases in adults

 

Habitat

No. of IgM +ve cases

Total Cases

Percentage

2013

2014

Rural & Tribal

47

7

54

55.67%

Semi urban

35

8

43

44.32%

Total

82

15

97

 

Table 5: Distribution of IgM positive cases as per habitat

 

 

Videos :

watch?v